What is the most challenging part of trying to eat like a Buddhist monk?
a. Do nothing but eat
b. Eat in silence
c. Eat V- - E - - R - -Y ......................S- L – O – W – L - Y
d. Eat everything in your bowl
e. Drink the water used to clean the bowls
f. All of the above.
Personally I’d have serious problems with the first one. I’ve to break a lifetime habit of multitasking at mealtimes – I’d be catching up on news and rushing through breakfast simultaneously, gulping down lunch while Googling on the office desktop and socializing time, either with family, friends or the idiot box, takes place over dinner. I honestly can’t remember the last time, if ever, when I simply sat down and ate without the company of a book, magazine, radio, TV, mobile phone or human being. The notion of simply eating without talking, reading, listening to music or surfing seems like some alien norm from a galaxy far, far away.
So why on earth would I want to eat like a Korean Buddhist monk?
First of all, it’s green – with the emphasis on organic ingredients and no wasting of food to the extent that you’re expected to take only what you can consume and you’re even supposed to drink the water used to clean the bowl and slurp down each tiny morsel remaining in the bowl.
Next, it’s healthy –temple meals are wholesome, high in protein and low in calories. There’s no meat and no alcohol. Instead of using highly processed ingredients such as white rice and chemical additives like MSG, vegetarian dishes are prepared with natural condiments such as shitake powder and kelp powder. Fermented ingredients which can lower cholesterol and inhibit cancer are widely used in temple recipes. Modest portions are also encouraged instead of super-sized meals.
Third, I can feel virtuous meditating while chewing my cud. A typical pre-meal chant goes like this:
“Where has this food come from? My virtues are so little that I am hardly worthy to receive it. I will take it as medicine to get rid of greed in my mind and to maintain my physical being in order to achieve enlightenment.”
The dining experience is to the sunims, a sacred ritual and an opportunity to appreciate and reflect on the interconnectedness of life. While I won’t go so far as to meditate on the virtues of the farmers and the middlemen who played their part in bringing the tchigae to the table, it’s better than mindlessly stuffing my mouth while being distracted by various things that have nothing to do with the meal. I don’t expect every mealtime to be the “very moving experience” described by environmentalist and chimp expert Jane Goodall who took part in the food ceremony during her visit to Korea in 2006 but hopefully like her, I’ll be able to appreciate the value of the food while “chewing the food slowly and thinking about where it had come from”.
But honestly, the main appeal is that I can bid annyeong to the kilos more effectively if I were to adopt the slow-eating habits of the sunims. Slow food, Korean-Buddhist style is not simply the slow-food as envisioned by Carlo Petrini, the founder of the original “slow food movement” in the mid-80s as a reaction against the MacDonald-isation of global food. Instead, it means adjusting one’s pace of eating to the others around you –not too fast and not too slow - all in the name of moderation and harmony.
Am clueless as to how long the usual balwoogongyang temple meal is but I’d like to imagine that mealtime is an unhurried affair without being languid. And that’s what I think will be the most difficult aspect to emulate though clearly there are good reasons for not rushing through meals. One scientific study suggests that if you take a longer time, like half an hour, to chew on your food ( or chew each small bite “15 to 20 times”) and take many pauses between bites to complete a meal, you’re more likely to feel fuller and actually consume fewer calories.
But in a 24/7 world with pressing deadlines, where restaurants and cafes try to outdo each other by the number of TV screens lit up in their dining areas and by their wi-fi accessibility, how does one stop multi-tasking and just literally watch what one eats?
sources:
http://issuu.com/hikekorea/docs/kfs_booklet_final_standard_size
http://www.buddhistchannel.tv/index.php?id=7,3489,0,0,1,0
http://www.nytimes.com/slideshow/2012/02/08/dining/20120208-MINDFUL.html?ref=buddhism
http://koreantemplecuisine.net/blog/?paged=2
http://www.buddhistchannel.tv/index.php?id=7,1469,0,0,1,0
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_temple_cuisine
http://eng.templestay.com/board/board.asp?bt=9&idx=129&cid=21
http://jentrinque.wordpress.com/2010/08/04/
http://mingkok.buddhistdoor.com/resources/get/c8128cf9ec4137dba476c10334da59541d365c65/241/0


1 comment:
敬爱的佛教伩徒,
有关马來西亜,吉隆坡,甲洞帝沙再也 (暹寺) 三宝寺 Samnak Sambodhi Buddhist Association No.19-21 Jalan 38 Taman Desa Jaya, Kepong 52100 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. 所发生的纠纷, 经过阅读了,Venerable Phra Piya Thammo 和尚及叶金福律师 (Yip Kum Fook) 的双方书信之后, 再经实地旁听了觧,做为中间人,我要客观实事的说:
1.当一个和尚、初出道 (小学生),在修行, 若有缺点, 那是难免.他马华公会鹅唛區会主地席叶金福律师(Yip Kum Fook),却心眼看不顺,就电招警万到耒佛教之圣地要扣畄和尚耒耻唇出家人, 这是绝对不许可, 除非是殺人放火之大罪悪.
2.他身为马华公会鹅唛區会主席叶金福律师 (Yip Kum Fook),却反其道而行, 在佛寺不依佛法而軽视佛教的精神, 以傲慢的手段,帶领一般黑社会的人耒挑衅和尚打架, 这也是不该有、更不是佛教修行者的行为.
3.佛教的圣地, 其主要的目地, 是让眾生修佛道, 不是政治争執的地方. 他马华公会鹅唛区会主席叶金福律师 (Yip Kum Fook), 却利用佛教之圣地当政治活动的场所。如此果敢冒犯佛陀的教誨,更是大大的罪悪。
囯有囯章,彿有佛法,家有家规. 如果出家人有何不对之处, 他叶金福律师 (Yip Kum Fook), 为何不向主持和尚投?让出家人自依和尚的條规处理、却强权一味要显示他是马华公会鹅唛区会及三宝寺理事会主席, 无法无天的应用霸道手段践踏佛教之圣地.为什么。。。。。为什么.
至今, 他叶金福律师 (Yip Kum Fook),不当不歉愧,还要狡辩, 这又证明了他说一套, 做的又是另一套, 囗是心非, 所谓的两舌, 相当阴险. 身为律师, 受高深教育, 却应用如此悪毒, 横蛮无礼的作风污辱和尚, 相等于是耻辱佛教伩仰者。他叶金福律师(Yip Kum Fook)不向主持和尚投诉, 却自承英雄,电招外耒者.请问,身为將近20年的三宝寺主持和尚兼顾问,也是第一位 自筹建寺的大功臣,在大马南傳泒中,是闻名遐邇的高僧.其脸要放在那裡?同样的,要是台湾星雲大师的佛寺沙彌犯錯, 理事会没有礼貌自作主张,电招警方要扣畄其沙彌.我敢请问!星雲大师的自尊是怎样的感受?他叶金福律师(Yip Kum Fook)是后耒者,担任理会主席也不久, 竟敢应用如此,目无尊長的方式对待住持,间接的就是告大家,强迫住持和尚必远離,雀巢鸠要佔。这种用心不良, 有老千之谋, 的确令人不敢恭维。
縱观以上几项重点,我不是盲目的護持三宝, 而是要坦白的说;他叶金福律师 (Yip Kum Fook) 身受高深教育, 为律师者,本应通情达理才是,但遗憾的是, 却令人惊觉, 他厡耒就是彿书裡所讲的狡猾且残忍的此颣人。他叶金福律师 (Yip Kum Fook),利用他的专业知識, 懂得包裝自己的道德守則,以宗教为幌子手,到处募款,商业经营, 政治活动为重, 并没依循佛教宗教守则行事, 也没对人道作出任何貢献, 只不过借宗教之名捞取权和私利而己。
在此, 我奉劝, 他马华公会鹅唛区会主席叶金福律师 (Yip Kum Fook), 好自为之, 免因果報应.
Post a Comment